Prediction of Roscoe Tanner vs Chris Kachel Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs C. Kachel

Roscoe Tanner

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Chris Kachel

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Tanner 1 - 0 Kachel

They have played 2 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 2 and Chris Kachel winning 0. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Chris Kachel was at the Hong Kong, 07-11-1977, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tanner	1
Kachel	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Hong Kong(11-07-77)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Chris Kachel

R. Tanner vs C. Kachel H2H Profile

R. Tanner	Stats	C. Kachel
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (604-302)	Career Total W/L	30.08% (40-93)
1	Hard	0
17	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Tanner vs C. Kachel Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chris Kachel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chris Kachel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chris Kachel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Chris Kachel winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/59). Chris Kachel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 13/23), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Chris Kachel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 1 times and Chris Kachel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 2 and Chris Kachel winning 0.
The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Chris Kachel was at the Hong Kong, 07-11-1977, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Chris Kachel has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chris Kachel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chris Kachel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roscoe Tanner vs Chris Kachel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Tanner vs C. Kachel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Tanner	Stats	C. Kachel
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

C. Kachel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 26-12-1980
R2 John SadriJ. Sadri	L	6-3 6-3 6-4	Stats
Sydney Outdoor - 15-12-1980
R2 Syd BallS. Ball	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Brisbane - 06-10-1980
R3 Cliff LetcherC. Letcher	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Boston - 14-07-1980
R2 Tim MayotteT. Mayotte	L	6-4 6-7 6-3	Stats
Wimbledon - 23-06-1980
R1 Brian GottfriedB. Gottfried	L	7-5 6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

R. Tanner vs C. Kachel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Tanner	Stats	C. Kachel
66.67% (604/302)	YTD Win/Loss	30.08% (40/93)
63.03% (1439/844)	Sets Win/Loss	36.50% (123/214)
54.41% (12342/10342)	Games Win/Loss	44.95% (1436/1759)
66.98% (215/106)	Hard Win/Loss	36.11% (13/23)
62.42% (98/59)	Clay Win/Loss	20.69% (6/23)
64.66% (161/88)	Indoor Hard W/L	11.11% (1/8)
73.42% (116/42)	Grass Win/Loss	35.09% (20/37)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
549.44	Average Opponent Rank	608.04
73.17% (90/33)	Slam W/L	27.27% (6/16)
54.39% (31/26)	Masters W/L	25.00% (1/3)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
66.48% (474/239)	Main Tour W/L	27.17% (25/67)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	53.33% (8/7)
67% (505/759)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	30% (34/112)
67% (90/134)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (5/20)
39% (15/38)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
56% (161/288)	Deciding Set Win %	27% (12/45)
86% (596/514)	1st Set Won, Won Match	67% (46/31)
14% (596/82)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	33% (46/15)
28% (299/83)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (86/8)